Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 31% better in Starfield than Athlon 3000G - 67 vs 51 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - €82.24 vs €129.99
- Up to 17% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11400 - €1.61 vs €1.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13428 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
51
76%
Value, €/FPS
€1.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13428 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |