Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 21% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G645T - 181 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €25.66 vs €174.89
- Up to 82% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-10600K - €0.17 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
17%
Price, €
€174.89
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €174.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
149
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |