Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3570K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-3570K - 350 vs 325 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3570K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €49.97 vs €141.58
- Up to 62% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-10400F - €0.15 vs €0.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
37%
Price, €
€141.58
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11528 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
325
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-3570K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |