Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-2400S - 163 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €69.9 vs €143.11
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10400F - €0.49 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
55%
Price, €
€143.11
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
144
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |