Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 614 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i5-10400F - 726 vs 718 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €78.8 vs €141.58
- Up to 45% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-10400F - €0.11 vs €0.2 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
726
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |