Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 3 than Core i3-4130 - 201 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €18.15 vs €141.58
- Up to 87% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Core i5-10400F - €0.09 vs €0.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
12%
Price, €
€141.58
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13521 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
194
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13521 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |