Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2517 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3250 - 175 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74733 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
36.99582753824757%
Multi-Core
1130
19.648756737958617%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |