Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-10400F - 315 vs 311 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
311
98.73015873015873%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€200
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
86.8882175226586%
Multi-Core
5751
39.44715001028877%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |