Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i5-10400F - 177 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€137.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €137.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |