Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 157 days older than Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-10400F - 161 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 48 vs 12 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1438
86.2627474505099%
Multi-Core
5751
43.18540211759405%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |