Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-10400 - 258 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 64 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €131.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1430
86.404833836858%
Multi-Core
5489
37.65004458467659%
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |