Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 539 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 23 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 277 vs 238 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €143.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Single-Core
1655
75.53628480146052%
Multi-Core
14579
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |