Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10200H outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10200H is 2201 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10200H
- Performs up to 7% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 697 vs 649 FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 45 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10200H - 16 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-10200H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10200H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
