Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10200H outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10200H is 2201 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10200H
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 547 vs 500 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10200H - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10200H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
928
70.46317388003037%
Multi-Core
5910
100%
Intel Core i5-10200H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
