Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 2190 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G645T - 131 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i3-9100 - €25.66 vs €311.67
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-9100 - €0.23 vs €2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €311.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
113
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |