Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100T outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100T is 2364 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Performs up to 137% better in League of Legends than FX-4100 - 123 vs 52 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €22.88 vs €99.96
- Up to 46% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-8100T - €0.44 vs €0.81 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €99.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |