Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 94% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-4300 - 91 vs 47 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - €24.38 vs €214.78
- Up to 78% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-8100 - €0.52 vs €2.36 per FPS
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
22.033898305084747%
Price, €
€214.78
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €214.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
47
51.64835164835166%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |