Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €44.87 vs €78.8
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - €0.24 vs €0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100 - 192 vs 184 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€44.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €44.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13592 minutes ago
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13591 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |