Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1622 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Ryzen 3 1200 - 204 vs 195 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - €78.7 vs €140.52
- Up to 46% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 3 1200 - €0.39 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Buy for €140.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |