Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 945 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 8% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 127 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |