Buy on Amazon
€49.68
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than FX-6300 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
LANCHY AMD FX-Series FX-6300 CPU Processore Desktop 6-Core 6-Thread Usato 3,5 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 347 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
