Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3089 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4160 - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €171.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
46.46288209606987%
Multi-Core
2072
19.283387622149835%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |