Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 555 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 155 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than FX-8350 - €33.4 vs €285.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - €0.22 vs €1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13736 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |