Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i3-390M - 179 vs 150 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |