Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2044 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-380M - 171 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |