Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2915 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-380M - 216 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€192.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €192.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |