Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3176 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-380M - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
