Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 7 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than FX-4130 - 44 vs 43 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
