Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €23.0 vs €177.61
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3240 - 294 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75089 minutes ago
Buy for €177.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
22.231139646869984%
Multi-Core
1137
13.568019093078759%
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |