Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-4130 - 468 vs 395 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €18.23 vs €160.92
- Up to 85% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-14100F - €0.05 vs €0.34 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
468
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
14%
Price, €
€160.92
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €160.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
395
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |