Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2101 days newer than Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Core i3-3210 - 273 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
273
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€635
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |