Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1654 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €10.58 vs €60.9
- Up to 82% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3900 - €0.09 vs €0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-2100 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
118
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |