Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 85% better in F1 23 than Core i3-3220 - 283 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - €18.29 vs €99.85
- Up to 66% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i3-13100F - €0.12 vs €0.35 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €99.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
153
54%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |