Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3450 - 164 vs 147 FPS
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - €151.33 vs €244.89
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3450 - €0.92 vs €1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17698 minutes ago
Buy for €244.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |