Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Core i5-3330 - 228 vs 214 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3330 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €37.44 vs €166.94
- Up to 77% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-10320 - €0.17 vs €0.73 per FPS
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
228
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
23.287671232876715%
Price, €
€166.94
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €166.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58325 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
214
93.85964912280701%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58325 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
555
36.06237816764132%
Multi-Core
1643
35.51664504971898%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |