Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 353 vs 339 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €74.94 vs €151.33
- Up to 49% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.22 vs €0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
353
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
51%
Price, €
€151.33
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
339
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |