Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - 134 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than FX-8350 - €151.33 vs €285.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - €1.13 vs €2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11828 minutes ago
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11828 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |