Buy on Amazon
€110.06
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 575 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 191 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel® Core™ i3-10300, processore per sistemi desktop 4 core fino a 4,4 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €110.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
