Buy on Amazon
€115.36
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2824 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 70% better in Diablo IV than Core i5-2400 - 177 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
104
58.75706214689266%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€115.36
100%
Value Winner
Intel CORE I5-2400 3.10GHZ SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED, BX80623I52400 (SKT1155 6MB CACHE BOXED)
Buy for €115.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
554
43.4850863422292%
Multi-Core
1607
21.558894553259993%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
| Colfax | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
