Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Ryzen 7 1700X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1475 days newer than Ryzen 7 1700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 13% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 7 1700X - 183 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105F - 16 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |