Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 320 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €113.24 vs €199.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - €0.6 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10105 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
189
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2557 minutes ago
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2558 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |