Buy on Amazon
€103
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2667 - 168 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-10100
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10100, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 4 core fino a 4,3 GHz LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 65 W
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Core i3-10100
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E5-2667
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
