Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 759 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - 188 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-8100T - €103.0 vs €199.59
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-8100T - €0.55 vs €1.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |