Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1005G1 outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1005G1 is 2473 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1005G1
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 158 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-1005G1
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 12.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
