Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2682 days newer than Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-5820K - 424 vs 403 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €70.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |