Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3775 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G540 - 160 vs 148 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €70.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
24.703680598877106%
Multi-Core
679
25.18545994065282%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |