Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 455 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 54 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 490 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
