Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 1213 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 35 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Celeron G3930T - 179 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €20.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
68.07453416149069%
Multi-Core
948
56.80047932893948%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |