Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1533 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 255 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
98.82352941176471%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61758 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |