Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 551 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3930T - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |